Talent Management
Profiling, assessment, 9-box calibration, successor slates and readiness — the architecture that decides who leads next, and the evidence behind it.
HR leader, 14+ years across FMCG, manufacturing, retail, food service and fintech banking
Building Future LeadersTransforming Talent, Learning & Organizational CapabilityLeveraging AI to Shape High-Performing, Human-Centered Organizations

Profiling, assessment, 9-box calibration, successor slates and readiness — the architecture that decides who leads next, and the evidence behind it.
Curriculum architecture, competency matrices, leadership programs and statutory training — designed, facilitated, and moved to scale.
Structure, capability building and change work that ties people strategy to operating results rather than to a deck.
Engagement strategy, organizational health and culture work — with the listening mechanisms that tell you whether any of it is landing.
The story that attracts talent and the credentials that prove it — including Great Place To Work and HR Asia certification as person-in-charge.
Fourteen years inside brands Filipinos buy every day, a regional dairy multinational, and one digital bank built from nothing.
Sep 2024 – Mar 2025 · An intentional career break, kept active through consultancy — team-strengthening programs for Antel Global and BPI.
Good talent decisions are difficult when the story of a person is scattered across spreadsheets, assessments, and review conversations. Talent 360 was built to change that—not simply by putting data in one place, but by making the whole talent story visible.
Across 26 business segments and 340+ talents, I brought together performance, potential, 9-box placement, readiness, retention risk, competencies, and development priorities into a single talent view.
Talent 360 says who the successors are. Launchpad 2.0 is what happens to them next.
Succession discussions often start with different pieces of information—roles, potential successors, readiness, and retention concerns. The Succession Map brought these together into a more consistent view of leadership continuity across the organization.
Talent decisions used to rest on who remembered whom. They now rest on one consolidated view of competency, performance and potential.
Reported around three pillars: build future leaders, protect capability and continuity, strengthen the pipeline.
Executive capability assessed group-wide: strong operators, thin on enterprise thinking and executive presence. Spend now points there.
The capability audit turned inward too, shaping an HR Academy built for what the function is actually being asked to do.
Where an instrument was needed and none existed, I built it rather than waiting a procurement cycle.
AI structures, ranks and drafts. It never decides who is a successor — that call sits with the leaders accountable for it.
Based in the Philippines, with experience working across Asia-Pacific through regional working groups, COE partnerships, and cross-market collaboration. I’ve contributed as a subject matter expert, facilitated learning sessions with diverse teams, and worked alongside regional counterparts to shape and adapt talent and learning initiatives across different cultural contexts.
Every organization draws this grid. Fewer decide what actually happens in each box. Pick one.
Delivers now and can go further, faster than the structure around them.
Put them on the successor track and tell them so. Launchpad 2.0 cohort, a named critical role to aim at, and board visibility. I run a stay interview early — this is the group that leaves quietly while everyone assumes they are happy.
Review portals, dashboards, databanks. If the function needs an instrument and nobody has bought one, I prototype it and put it in front of users the same week.
Competency records, review notes and scattered org data become reusable pipelines — the next cycle costs hours instead of weeks, and the numbers reconcile.
Board and CFO narratives shaped fast, then edited hard by hand. Speed on the first draft buys time for the argument and the questions I will be asked in the room.
AI structures, ranks and drafts. It does not decide who is a successor. Calibration, readiness and promotion calls stay with the leaders accountable for them.
I’m ready for a Head-level or regional role across Talent Management, Organizational Development, Learning & Development, or broader HR leadership. At this stage of my career, I’m most interested in owning a function end to end—shaping the strategy, building the architecture behind it, developing the team, and making sure the work ultimately changes how the organization develops and retains its people.
Yes. I am mobile — open to roles based in the Philippines, with a multinational operating here, or abroad. I have worked across seven Asia-Pacific markets and am comfortable operating across time zones and cultural contexts.
Building instruments the function does not have, structuring messy people data into pipelines that survive the next cycle, and accelerating the first draft of executive material so the time goes into the argument.
What I do not use it for is the decision. It never places a person in a box.
Yes — as prototypes that prove the workflow in a live cycle, not as enterprise software. When something needs to scale, the prototype becomes the spec, and a spec written from a working tool is a very different conversation with IT or a vendor.
Both. I still run team-building and leadership sessions through Lighthouse Consultancy on weekends. Standing in front of a room is the fastest feedback loop there is on whether a program works — you cannot get that from a completion report.
Yes — a former manager, a former colleague and a former direct report are happy to speak to my work. Contact details on request.
If you are building a talent function — or fixing one — I would like to hear what you are up against. Open to opportunities in the Philippines and abroad.
PDF · Updated 2026
Metro Manila, Philippines · Open to relocation